PenTest Hub logo

AI/ML Red Teaming & LLM Penetration Testing

Your AI features are a new attack surface. We test LLM applications, AI agents, RAG pipelines and machine learning models for prompt injection, data leakage, jailbreaks and abuse, before your customers or attackers find them.

Request an Assessment
The Evolving Threat Landscape

Why AI Systems Need Offensive Security Testing

Large language models follow instructions found in their input, so untrusted content can steer them. AI agents with tool access can be tricked into leaking data or taking actions, and RAG systems can expose documents across users and tenants. Scanners don’t find these issues. They need manual, adversarial testing by people who understand both offensive security and how models behave. Our AI red teaming is led by certified testers and mapped to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications and MITRE ATLAS.

Our Accreditations

Trusted by
Global Enterprises

CREST PenTest Hub
OSCP PenTest Hub
Offensive Security Certified Professional (OSCP+)
CompTIA Security PenTest Hub
AI ML PenTest Hub
DRAFT 02 AIRTP
DFIR
eCPPT
Web Application Penetration Tester eXtreme
CRTP
CARTP
Practical Network Penetration Tester (PNPT)
CPSA
CRT

Benefits of AI Red Teaming

AI red teaming shows how your models, prompts, agents and data pipelines behave when someone actively tries to misuse them, so you can ship AI features with confidence.

Guided by Leading Cybersecurity Standards:

Our AI security testing follows the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications, MITRE ATLAS, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and ISO/IEC 42001, and supports evidence for the robustness and cybersecurity requirements of the EU AI Act.

Find Prompt Injection Before Attackers Do
Uncover direct and indirect prompt injection, jailbreaks and system prompt leakage that let attackers override your AI’s instructions.
Prevent Sensitive Data Leakage
Test whether models, RAG pipelines and logs can be made to reveal customer data, secrets or other users’ documents.
Secure AI Agents & Tool Use
Assess agents, plug-ins and MCP integrations for excessive agency, unsafe tool calls and privilege escalation.
Protect Models & Training Data
Evaluate exposure to model extraction, membership inference, data poisoning and adversarial inputs.
Support EU AI Act Readiness
Produce independent testing evidence for robustness and cybersecurity obligations under the EU AI Act and your internal AI governance.
Launch AI Features With Confidence
Get clear, reproducible findings and practical guardrail, design and output-handling fixes your engineers can apply.

AI Red Teaming Approaches Based on Access and Risk

We tailor every AI engagement to how your system is built and what it can reach, from a public chatbot to an autonomous agent connected to internal tools.

Black Box AI Testing
We attack your AI application as an external user would, with no insider knowledge, to find prompt injection, jailbreak and data leakage paths.
Grey Box AI Testing
With user accounts and architecture context, we test tenant isolation, RAG retrieval boundaries and agent permissions in depth.
White Box AI Review
With access to system prompts, guardrails, code and model configuration, we review the full AI pipeline for design-level weaknesses.

What We Test & How We Approach It

We cover the full AI stack: the application around the model, the agents and tools it can use, the data it retrieves and the models themselves. Every finding comes with reproducible prompts or payloads, a risk rating and clear remediation guidance. Related services: application penetration testing, cloud penetration testing and red teaming.

We test customer-facing and internal LLM apps for direct and indirect prompt injection, jailbreaks, system prompt extraction, insecure output handling (XSS and SSRF via model output) and abuse of business logic.

We assess agents and their tools, plug-ins and MCP servers for excessive agency, unsafe actions, privilege escalation and data exfiltration through tool calls.

We test retrieval-augmented generation for cross-tenant data access, sensitive data disclosure, document and embedding poisoning, and weak access controls on knowledge sources.

We evaluate models and the infrastructure around them for adversarial examples, model extraction, membership inference, training data poisoning and insecure inference APIs, model registries and notebooks.

contact pentest hub 600
Security Expertise You Can Count On

Get in Touch

Have questions? Send us a message, and we’ll reply promptly.